Friday, October 26, 2012

NY health officials to release fracking plan by Nov. 6

New York state health officials expect to have terms nailed down within two weeks for several independent experts to review the state’s assessment of health risks associated with shale gas development.

Bill Schwarz, director of Public Affairs for the state Health Department, said today that the review would begin when contract terms were finalized with reviewers – a housekeeping task expected to be completed within a “week or two at the most.” The state will work with three or four experts (Schwarz was unsure of the final number) to review draft of a policy to allow permitting for shale gas development and the controversial practice of high volume hydraulic fracturing in New York.

DEC Commissioner Joseph Martens announced the plan for additional review five weeks ago with mounting pressure from environmental groups pushing for a more complete record of how fracking might affect public health. Activists from both grass roots and mainstream environmental organizations are urging the state to quantify a range of risks such as chemical exposure from air and water emissions, industrial accidents, community stresses related to noise, traffic, housing, and demographic changes, as well as considering resources necessary to manage them.

The most recent draft of the state’s shale gas policy, called the Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS), has not yet been publically released. Initial drafts, released in 2009 and 2011, met with extensive public criticism. (There was no draft released in 2010, as stated in the original version of this post.) During public hearings and sessions, industry representatives, activists, landowners, unions, health professionals, and local and national government officials submitted more than 80,000 comments, all of which DEC staff and consultants must address before the SGEIS is finalized. The original document focused mostly on environmental concerns. The current (unreleased) draft also addresses health issues raised in the public comment period, according to officials.

The plan to enlist a panel of health experts to review the SGEIS was a matter of due diligence, according to Martens. “I want to ensure that the Department has the most legally defensible review so that when the Department issues its final determination on this matter, protracted litigation is avoided, whatever the outcome,” he said in a statement announcing the review last month.

New York state -- which sits over the Marcellus and Utica shale reserves -- has become the showcase of the national debate over the risks and merits of hydraulic fracturing and a related on-shore drilling boom. Until last month, most of the focus has been on Martens and DEC. Now DOH Commissioner Nirav Shah has an influential voice in the outcome. His department is in charge with choosing the reviewers and then ultimately recommending whether the DEC is ready to issue shale gas permits or has more work to do,

More information about the health review, including its scope, timeline, and the names of reviewers, will be released when the contracts are signed. Schwarz characterized the work as a “review of the review” that will essentially tell officials whether the state’s draft document adequately accounts for and mitigates health risks associated with fracking, or whether more work needs to be done and if so what recommendations should be followed.

The state is developing regulations for shale gas concurrently with its environmental review. Officials face a Nov. 29 deadline – a year from the last public hearing -- to complete the review or redefine and restart the rulemaking process. That would mean reopening the process to public hearings and the potential for another barrage of criticism. As recently as last week, Martens offered the possibility that the health review could be completed by Nov. 29 even though details of the plan have not been finalized. Under certain scenarios, that could technically allow permitting to begin by the end of the year, although other factors could discourage it, including administrative hang-ups in the technically and legally dense process, or political pressure after the elections.

The shale gas controversy locally and nationally is defined by influential stakeholders and interest groups allied with bitterly opposing positions. Anti-fracking activists in New York state are seeking a sanctioned and independent Health Impact Assessment, apart from the SGEIS, with its own scope and public review process. Landowners, supported by the industry, have threatened to challenge the state on Constitutional grounds if policy prohibits them from developing their mineral rights. Others are expected to sue if they feel the policy jeopardizes their health and wellbeing. Lawsuits have already been filed on other grounds, with local municipalities challenging the state and the industry’s exclusive control over citing of wells – an issue known as Home Rule.

While the Cuomo administration works through various legal and technical considerations of crafting shale gas policy, it must also be ready for a possible shift in political winds on November 6. If Republicans lose the Senate, then the Legislature would be in a position to mandate more rigorous standards that could effectively block or delay shale gas development. If Republicans hold the Senate, then it is unlikely the Legislature could pass bills to significantly delay drilling.

15 comments:

  1. Remain concerned about the method of picking and contracting with experts. The length of time involved does not bode well. Any review that is conducted by a few hand-picked experts, after a long "contracting" period smacks of expert-witness hiring methodology: first you decide the position you want to defend, then you shop for the best expert who will defend your position that you can afford.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The public should have a chance to read and comment on any health review. Ideally, a formal health impact assessment should be conducted. Secretive half measures are not acceptable where public health is concerned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. four years 3 months and 1 week - and counting - is LONG ENOUGH!

      Delete
  3. Let's not forget that one of the tasks charged to the the Advisory Panel was consulting with agencies like DOH and DOT to determine what impacts were expected and what additional resources they would need to deal with them. It does not look good that this panel hasn't met all year. It also doesn't seem right that a major new section of the SGEIS gets adopted as final without public comment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The panel has been taken out of the picture for undisclosed reasons. I talk about that a little more in this post: http://tomwilber.blogspot.com/2012/08/record-clearly-shows-cuomos-ambivalence.html
    Also, see this link:http://innovationtrail.org/post/fracking-advisory-panel-calls-third-meeting-three-months

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The above comment was removed because it had a link that violated my spam policy and was irrelevant to the discussion

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How to value company?

    Entrepreneurs generally inquire, tips on how to value company May be the amount simply just ripped from nothing? The simple truth ishow to value company is a rather easy strategy. The Enpowergroup.com worth regarding virtually any small business, publicly-traded share, as well as various other personal asset can be the sum the existing worth of the funds streams required to possibly be generated through which investment decision. Today’s worth is a purpose of the predicted potential world wide web funds streams how the owner as well as investor can expect for getting by possession of their asset, reduced presenting trip to the risk-adjusted low cost charge. Obviously, funds streams that could take place all 5 many years by today are well worth less throughout today ’s bucks, because of a volume of aspects including risk along with the “time worth regarding cash.
    With our broad selection of Capital Raising ranging from conventional lending options and responsibilities to be able to difficult structured financing, we’ll assist acquire your organization to the next degree. Our understanding and practical knowledge within determining the Capital Raising for the buyers throughout goods allow us all to address all our own clients’ cash wants, such as purchase financing, buyouts, control buyouts, growth cash, affected property financing, recapitalization, pre-IPO placements, shareholder financing, and so on.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hotelcram.com is committing to offer you the most valuable products and services in order to publication a new resort within Cram Barcelona Hotel center. We have been the actual Hotel Barcelona Centre residence providing luxurious holiday accommodation emerge essentially the most enjoyable looking center on earth. Boutique Hotel Barcelona will greatly enhance your take a trip expertise with something different; heritage, traditions or maybe a feeling connected with area.

    The bedrooms at the Pack Resort also feature LCD TV, Wi-Fi and internet access, a digital mini bar and the bathing room has a hair dryer, slippers and gown. Most bedrooms also have a small terrace looking out over the road below. The Pack Resort Spain's capital is situated on the wide, up market road Aribau which is covered with ancient structures and stylish stores and cafes. There is a bank right reverse the place and a drugstore on the other area. An outdoor share offers a break from the heat and the crowd of main Spain's capital, while the entrance hall bar is the perfect conversion into this citys famous night life.

    The employees at the trip table will be able to book trips and touring during your remain in Spain's capital. Our Friendly, beneficial and well ready team is willing to help you with anything you might need to make your remain at Hotel Design Barcelona Centre as enjoyable as possible.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Under certain scenarios, that could technically allow permitting to begin by the end of the year, although other factors could discourage it, including administrative hang-ups in the technically and legally dense process, or political pressure after the elections. health site

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This shale gas development is a main harmful and Public health is a main concern here which should be taken seriously. I think it is nice to talk about these type of health concern issues.http://www.myvirtualpaper.com/doc/columbiauniversity/cphmagazine-winter2012-13/2012102501/46.html#46

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for the post. When I heard about environmental site assessment phase 2 , I was really impressed because it is very important to assess any land. I appreciate this.

    ReplyDelete